Platform / AMR Resistance Scoring
AMR Resistance Scoring
Score antimicrobial resistance risk before the culture comes back.
Prescient scores the likelihood that a patient's infection involves antimicrobial-resistant organisms, giving prescribers a risk-informed starting point while culture and sensitivity results are still pending.
The Problem
Why this matters
Empiric antibiotic selection often happens without a systematic view of a patient's individual resistance risk — driven instead by unit-level antibiograms alone, which miss patient-specific risk factors.
Inputs
What the model scores
- Prior culture and sensitivity history for the patient
- Recent antibiotic exposure and healthcare contact (facility transfers, prior admissions)
- Unit-level and facility-level resistance patterns
- Relevant comorbidities and device exposure (lines, catheters, ventilation)
Workflow
Where it shows up
- Resistance risk score surfaces alongside the empiric prescribing workflow
- Antimicrobial stewardship teams get a patient-level risk view, not just a unit antibiogram
- Score updates as new culture data becomes available
A Typical Scenario
How This Plays Out
- Hour 0Suspected infection, cultures pending
A patient presents with signs of infection. Cultures are sent, but sensitivity results are 24–72 hours away — empiric therapy has to start now.
- Hour 0Resistance risk scored
Prior culture history, recent antibiotic exposure, facility transfer history, and local resistance patterns combine into a patient-specific AMR risk score.
- Hour 1Prescriber reviews the score
The empiric prescribing workflow shows the resistance risk alongside standard antibiogram guidance — a more specific starting point than the unit average alone.
- Hour 48Culture results confirm or adjust
As sensitivity results return, the stewardship team reviews therapy alignment; the score updates for the next patient in a similar situation.
Data Flow
How Data Becomes a Risk Score
Prior cultures, antibiotic exposure, and facility transfer history.
Patient-specific risk blended with local resistance patterns.
Resistance risk surfaces alongside the antibiogram at order time.
Culture results confirm or adjust; the score updates going forward.
The Difference
Without vs. With AMR Resistance Scoring
| Without Prescient | With Prescient | |
|---|---|---|
| Empiric therapy basis | Unit-level antibiogram only | Patient-specific resistance risk plus the antibiogram |
| Timing | No resistance signal until cultures return | Risk-informed score available at the point of prescribing |
| Stewardship visibility | Facility-level resistance trends only | Patient-level risk view alongside facility trends |
| Feedback loop | Culture results reviewed case-by-case | Results feed back into the scoring for similar future cases |
Evidence & Validation
Scoring is developed in partnership with each system's antimicrobial stewardship program and validated against local resistance patterns.
Resistance-informed empiric therapy
A stewardship program tracked alignment between empiric antibiotic selection and eventual culture-confirmed sensitivity, before and after resistance scoring was introduced at the point of prescribing.
Frequently Asked
Questions about AMR Resistance Scoring
Explore the Platform
The Other Pillars
Advanced Illness
Find the patients who need a goals-of-care conversation — before a crisis forces one.
Learn more →